Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  58 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 58 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

Markets and Securities Services |

United Kingdom

56

The TSC said that it expected HMT to “appoint

an independent reviewer to re-examine the

case for a separate enforcement body”.

The TSC agreed with the finding of Andrew

Green QC in his HBOS report

3

that the

regulatory regime in place at the time of

HBOS’s collapse did not encourage ambitious

enforcement action. The TSC said, “In order

to be a credible last line of defence, there

must be a perception that regulators are

able to undertake even the most challenging

and complex of cases”.

Parliamentary Commission on Banking

Standards (PCBS)

Importantly, the TSC’s concern over the

perceived failures in enforcement stem from

the failure of the regulators to take more

senior bankers to task as a result of the global

financial crisis. The PCBS report,

Changing

Banking for Good

, published in 2013, was

also concerned with the perceived lack of

regulatory action against bankers.

4

The PCBS did not go so far as to recommend

a complete separation of the enforcement

function from the regulators, saying that

“to propose this change now would involve a

new organisational upheaval for the financial

services regulators, almost immediately after

a major set of organisational changes have

come into effect”.

Decisions to invoke enforcement powers

are taken inside the FCA by the Regulatory

Decisions Committee (RDC). The PCBS said

that the RDC “is not best-suited to the

specific enforcement needs of the banking

sector”. The PCBS recommended “the

creation of an autonomous body to assume

the decision-making role of the Regulatory

Decisions Committee for enforcement in

relation to the banking sector”.

Winning the Global Race

In 2015, the British Bankers Association

(BBA) published

Winning the Global Race

,

drawing on the consultancy services of

Oliver Wyman.

5

This report was concerned

with the competitiveness of the UK as

an international centre and aimed at

“developing a strategy to safeguard the

position of the UK as a leading international

banking centre, hosting foreign banks and

UK-headquartered wholesale banks”.

Sir Hector Sants, formerly the CEO of the

FSA, was one of the Oliver Wyman consultants

who worked on the report. His involvement

inevitably created headlines when the report

was published.

The BBA said in its report:

6

The current remit of regulators covers

supervision, penalty and redress. This can

distort incentives and create the potential

for regulatory moral hazard and political

influence. Many contributors believed

that an independent body responsible for

redress would result in better outcomes, not

only for banks but also for their customers

in ensuring rigorous alignment of redress

amounts with the cost of any misdeed.

Among its twenty-three recommendations, the

BBA also recommended that the government

should “consider the creation of a new

independent body responsible for penalty and

redress decision-making”.

Fairness for banks and bankers

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the BBA’s concern

is not with the number of senior bankers

disciplined, but rather with the political

pressures placed on regulators that can lead

to unfair outcomes for banks and their staff.

The condemnation of bankers and banking

has been something of an international sport

for the last few years, but it is important that

standards of fairness apply universally. Banks

and bankers have the same right as anyone

else to expect a fair application of the law.

The existing regime

In order to understand whether the existing

regime should be changed, it is necessary

first to understand what it is. The following

description draws on the PCBS’s report. The

FCA’s processes may have changed somewhat

in the meantime, but are believed to be

broadly similar.

As mentioned above, the body within the

FCA that makes enforcement decisions is

the RDC. However, before a case can be

considered by the RDC, it must first be

referred by Supervision and considered by

Enforcement. Inevitably, some cases referred

to Enforcement may be rejected before

reaching the RDC, but Enforcement staff

work together with staff from the referring