Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  12 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

Markets and Securities Services |

Asia

10

Introduction

There are many things that investors can say

about investing in China, but “uneventful” is

not one of them. At the beginning of 2016, the

Shanghai Composite Index was down over 40%

since its height during the summer of 2015. This

volatility is not unusual in the Chinese market,

but with the imposition of a circuit breaker

(which lasted about one week) and the vast

number of stocks listed on the Chinese markets

that suspended their listing, it certainly made

for a hectic start to the year.

The access channels for foreign investors looking

to invest in Chinese equities and bonds are

numerous and constantly evolving. In a relatively

short period of time, for example, we have

seen the launch of Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock

Connect, the launch of Mutual Recognition of

Funds (MRF) scheme, the relaxation of the rules

for the Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor

(QFII) Scheme and the Renminbi Qualified Foreign

Institutional Investor (RQFII) Scheme, and the

widening of access to the Chinese Interbank Bond

Market (CIBM), while the list of countries granted

RQFII quota has increased along with the launch,

most recently, of the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock

Connect (SZ-HK Stock Connect).

This activity has not taken place in a vacuum. It

is driven by the desire of the Chinese authorities

to attract international investors to their

markets generally and to be included in MSCI

indices, which, at a stroke, will cause billions of

dollars to be invested into Chinese stocks, as

anyone tracking these indices will be required to

invest into the A share market.

2

It is therefore

worth getting to grips with these regimes at an

early stage — to the extent that asset managers

operate index-tracking funds that would be

affected by the inclusion of China A shares in

any MSCI index in 2017, there will undoubtedly

be various regulatory hoops to jump through

both in the UK and abroad.

3

Below we focus on the recent developments to

the QFII, RQFII, SZ-HK Stock Connect, and CIBM

opportunities in particular.

QFII

Background

QFII is the longest running of the access

programmes. It was launched in 2002 to enable

specified types of institutional foreign investors

to invest in Chinese equities. As of October

2016, 273 foreign institutions were approved

as QFIIs, holding an aggregate QFII investment

quota of USD84.438billion.

4

The scheme has been subject to substantial change

over the years with the two most recent reforms

occurring in 2012 and 2016.

5

All of the reforms have

made it progressively easier for foreign investors to

access Chinese equities. The relaxations will be of

note to institutions interested in taking advantage

of the opportunity of participating in Chinese

stock markets, and they also help to address the

concerns of retail investment managers in the UK

and elsewhere as to how to access the market while

satisfying investor protection and risk management

requirements at home.

Products and participants

QFIIs and their products are broadly classified

into three types, for State Administration for

Foreign Exchange (SAFE) regulation and for FX

purposes, namely:

6

• Long-term investors, such as pension funds,

insurance funds, charitable foundations,

endowment funds, government and monetary

authorities (Long-Term Funds).

• Open-end China funds (essentially a type of

fund product managed by a QFII), which are

defined as open-end securities investment

funds set up offshore by QFIIs via public

placements, where at least 70% of assets

are invested in the securities market in China

(Open-end China Funds).

UPDATE: CHINA MARKET ACCESS

Taking a high-level overview of the various ways in which foreign investors

can access China’s equity and bond markets, this article focuses on some

of the more recent and relevant updates to and thinking on the QFII, RQFII,

SZ-HK Stock Connect and CIBM regimes in particular, each of which has its

own advantages and disadvantages for the discerning fund manager.

1