Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  11 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

Global Trustee and Fiduciary Services News and Views

| Issue 47 | 2017

9

that effectively starts from a consideration of

the position and experience of firms and not of

those of consumers.

Away from immediate consumer protection,

and even as the age of asset management

dawns, and society relies evermore on

individuals to save for their own retirement

provision, fears over financial stability remain.

The UK will continue to play a significant part

in global bodies such as the FSB and IOSCO on

this subject. This will be particularly important

as the discussions on stress-testing funds

ramps up. In the EU or not, the influence of

the UK will, as ever, come down to individuals

and the extent to which Mark Carney or

Andrew Bailey play key roles in committees.

Global engagement

Bilateral engagement among regulators

globally is already high, and shared

experiences of auto-enrolment and RDR will

likely ensure continued engagement with

Australian and Canadian colleagues. For the

funds industry, international questions may

presently be dominated by Brexit. Assuming

single market access is no longer unlimited,

managers will need to understand what the

ramifications are for all the other activities,

such as solicitation, marketing and aftersales

care. But after that come the bigger global

questions. Will the UK outside the EU now

allow Chinese and other funds the mutual

recognition they seek? Mutual recognition

is now a card that the UK government can

play, but so can the EU. There, however, the

experience of the AIFMD may be telling.

Perceived hostility to third country funds is

unlikely to turn to a full embrace in the EU

unless there is a huge political gain at stake.

China, India and Indonesia may offer that,

but the UK is likely to start from a more open

mindset to the concept of third country firms

and funds passporting in.

14

In 2008, as the financial crisis spread and

Lehman collapsed, people, including lobbyists,

politicians, legislators, began using a new

phrase to express what financial services did

and why it was important. It was the term,

“real economy”. Debate can be had as to what

is in or out, but its use, indeed its widespread

adoption as a lens through which to consider

what the financial services industry is doing,

institutionalises an “us and them” approach

to regulation and wider financial stability

policy. This division remains a huge risk for

asset managers, perhaps as much as for any

other part of financial services, as it suggests

these allocators of capital to businesses and

suppliers of later-life income are somehow

separate from the world of invested savers (or

saving investors), and are not a component

of the real economy. More than Brexit, more

than the level of an index, more than inflation

figures, the direction of regulation will depend

on the extent to which society and politicians

can be confident that financial services

activities are indeed beneficial for the real

economy and so for human welfare.

Guy Sears

1

International Organisation of Securities Commissions.

2

Retail Distribution Review (RDR).

3

“What Do Banks Do, What Should They Do and What Public

Policies are Needed to Ensure Best Results for the Real

Economy?”, speech by Lord Aidar Turner at Cass Business

School, 17 March 2010.

4

SROs are Self-Regulatory Organisations that, along

with the Securities and Investments Board, enforced UK

regulation until 2001, when they were replaced by the

Financial Services Authority (FSA). The FSA was replaced

by the FCA from 1 April 2013.

5

From

https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/

document/rppd/RPPD_Full_20160321.pdf,

last downloaded on 30 November 2016.

6

The fourth principle of good regulation imposed on the FCA is

entitled “Consumer responsibility” and it states “Consumers

should take responsibility for their decisions.” History has

shown this is broadly uninformative.

7

Speech by Andrew Bailey at the FCA’s 2016 annual public

meeting, accessible at

https://www.fca.org.uk/news/speeches/

chief-executive-speaks-apm-about-recent-work-and-future-

challenges, last accessed on 30 November 2016.

8

See

https://www.fca.org.uk/publications/corporate-documents/

our-future-mission, last accessed on 30 November 2016.

9

From

https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/occasional-papers/

occasional-paper-1.pdf, last downloaded on 30 November 2016.

10

Despite not being gender neutral, the term seemed apposite.

11

From

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/

attachment_data/file/556011/September_2016_Pensions_

publication.pdf, last downloaded on 30 November 2016.

12

See page 32 of FAMR’s final report, available at https://www.

fca.org.uk/publication/corporate/famr-final-report.pdf,

last

downloaded on 30 November 2016.

13

Arguably this is similar to what has motivated the US

Department of Labour, available at

https://www.dol.gov/

agencies/ebsa/about-ebsa/our-activities/resource-center/

fact-sheets/dol-final-rule-to-address-conflicts-of-interest, last

accessed on 30 November 2016.

14

China, India and Indonesia are only three examples among

others, but these are particularly populous nations.