Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  51 / 72 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 51 / 72 Next Page
Page Background

Global Trustee and Fiduciary Services News and Views

| Issue 47 | 2017

49

the introduction of founder shares (

parts

bénéficiaires

) with voting rights, the suspension

or waiver of voting rights and the “authorised

share capital” concept and also confirms that

a SARL may publicly issue debt instruments,

just to mention a few of the new key features.

Secondly, the Company Law Reform introduces

a new legal form for the simplified limited

company (

société par actions simplifiée

or SAS)

that will substantially enhance governance

structuring flexibility at manager and

shareholder levels when compared with the

ordinary limited company form. This new legal

form will be available for the implementation of

non-regulated AIFs in particular.

Structuring flexibility and legal certainty combined

The Company Law Reform offers new

opportunities in the structuring of shareholders’

participations. It legalises voting agreements and/

or unilateral undertakings in the exercise of voting

rights which may prove useful in the structuring of

coinvestment arrangements. It also legalises the

use of tracking shares that have long been used in

practice with no express legal basis.

Non-voting shares

A noteworthy development for the investment

funds industry is the possibility of issuing

shares of unequal value with limited voting

rights. The rules on the issue of non-voting

shares have also been substantially relaxed.

The latter development, in particular, offers new

opportunities for the investment funds industry.

On the one hand, it might prove interesting for

fund initiators (AIFs and to a lesser extent UCITS)

wishing to retain control over the structure. On

the other hand, the non-voting shares could

be issued for the benefit and on the request of

investors not wishing to be seen to be acquiring

control for consolidation or reporting purposes.

Why so? Although the possibility of issuing non-

voting shares was introduced into the 1915 Law

in 1983, the conditions applicable thereto, such

as the fact that non-voting shares could not

represent more than half of the share capital of

the company and preferential dividend rights

as well as voting rights on a number of matters,

have been considered to be too restrictive for

certain companies and an obstacle to the free

organisation of their governance.

The Company Law Reform eases the restrictions

and conditions applicable to the issuance of non-

voting shares. In particular, there is no limit to

the maximum number of such non-voting shares

fixed by law. It is left up to the general meeting of

shareholders to fix such number. This means that

in practice all shares but one may be non-voting

shares. The conditions for the issue of non-voting

shares, in particular the economic rights attached

to such shares, although freely determinable,

must be laid down in the articles of association.

The circumstances in which non-voting shares

must bear the right to vote are limited to cases

of the dissolution of the company, reduction of

its share capital and amendments of the rights

attached to such shares.

Transfers

Another interesting development for the

investment funds industry as a whole is

the new rules on the transfer of shares,

according to which any transfer of shares

of the company made in breach of the

restrictions set forth in the articles of

association of the company would be void.

This development brings legal certainty and

is useful for funds that need to control the

eligibility of their investors, e.g. where the

fund is restricted to well-informed investors

or limits the access of US persons.

The new provisions would bring reassurance

to the management bodies of the funds that

are vested, in accordance with the fund specific

legislation, with an obligation to ensure the

eligibility of investors and are ultimately liable

for the breach of law. It would permit the

directors of the fund to ignore the transfer

made in breach of the restrictions of the

articles of association and consider the

transferor to be a shareholder.

Governance: solutions and more options

As a second pillar of modernisation, the

Company Law Reform touches on the

governance feature applicable to the SA,

a legal form that can be used for the

formation of UCITS and AIFs as well as their

management companies or AIFMs.

It provides for real flexibility in structuring

management arrangements. All types of

management setup, be they individual or

collegial, are permitted. In addition, the law

provides a legal basis for various delegation

models of management powers, e.g. the

use of a management committee and the

concept of “general manager” have now

been included in the law.